Move a Java app to the web and mobile: the webinar

Maybe you've heard it in a meeting already: the app feels outdated, users want it in a browser and on their phones, and every upgrade feels slow and risky. If you need to move a Java app to the web and mobile, the answer in this webinar is to stay in Java. You run the existing app in the browser first, then rebuild it one piece at a time with webforJ, the full-stack Java framework, while the business logic keeps working.
Moving a desktop Java app to the web?
Send us a screenshot of one screen and we'll reply with how it moves to webforJ.
What the webinar covers
- 00:00 Three signs your Java app needs to move
- 02:09 The remote control problem: too many technologies
- 04:52 One language, one team, one codebase
- 06:18 The same small app built two ways
- 10:00 A customer that switched
- 12:04 Webswing and webforJ
- 14:30 Live demo: from Swing in the browser to a modern app in four stages
- 17:31 AI for Java teams
- 22:01 What full stack means: routing, Spring, and security
- 24:51 Three takeaways
- 26:22 Questions from the audience
Three signs it's time
The webinar opens with three problems most Java teams with a desktop app will recognize:
- The app feels outdated. Users expect a responsive interface that works on any device, and a desktop window doesn't.
- Two teams for one app. A web front end and a Java back end mean handoffs, friction, and slower releases.
- Upgrades hurt. Every modernization step feels slow, risky, or expensive.
If one of these sounds like your week, the rest of the session is for you.
The remote control problem
Matthew starts with a picture that sticks. You sit down to watch TV at someone else's place and find three or four remotes: one for the TV, one for the speakers, one for the streaming box. Each works. Together they make a simple task confusing.
A typical web stack for a Java app looks like that: a Java back end, a JavaScript framework, HTML, CSS, a build tool, and an API layer between them. Each layer brings its own skills to learn and its own ways to break. Together they weigh more than the business problem they solve.
One language, one codebase
The alternative is a single-stack Java approach: one language, one team, one codebase. To make that concrete, the webinar shows the same small temperature conversion app built twice.
The split version pairs a Spring Boot back end with an Angular front end. Even for something that small, the code spreads across four languages (Java, TypeScript, HTML, and CSS) and several files, plus the plumbing that lets the two halves talk. The webforJ version is plain Java. Both apps look the same in the browser. The effort to build and maintain them does not.
The point is not the size of the example. It's that the gap grows with the app. Less code means fewer bugs, less to maintain, and faster delivery, and every extra feature in the split stack pays the cost twice.
